10 October 2012
Dr. Bill Osmunson
President of Washington Action for safe Water
1418-112th Ave. NE Suite 200
Bellevue, Washington 98004
Ph: (425) 466-0100
On 3 October 2012, you received my letter addressed to the leaders of the anti-fluoridation movement to which I attached a digital copy of my book “Water, Salt, Milk: Killing Our Unborn Children”, wherein I prove that fluoridation is a depopulation policy and that it represents history’s worst genocide and in which I ask that you and your fellow campaigners:
“…inform the public of the lethal danger it is under by posting my book online on your websites and by reinforcing its conclusions with your own verdicts and reputations so that the incredulous and the ignorant will muster the courage to believe the unbelievable and will have the information they need to organize if they are to save their and their children’s lives.”
My letter is available online at: http://community.ejc.net/profiles/blog/show?id=2345725%3ABlogPost%3....
In your emailed response to me, dated 6 October 2012, you confirmed that fluoridation is a genocidal depopulation policy but that you are reluctant to say this publicly because:
“If I use the word "genocide" which I frequently think but don't say, then I will lose credibility. People will not accept that their government, the USA, the land that they love, is so barbaric. Instead of them listening to me, they will reject me.”
Instead of telling the public the awful truth all at once, as I have, you advocate a gradual approach:
“In one of my health education courses, a professor used an example which has stuck with me, although I frequently fail to follow the advice. If we place a person's "position" on any subject on a scale of one to ten and that person's position (any position, smoking, cholesterol, fluoride, etc) is at a "3" and we want to persuade them to change their position to a "10," then we need to first move them to a "4" or "5" and then to a "6 or 7" and then try to move them to a "10." If we try to move them all the way to a "10" at the first contact, then there is a good chance most people will react negatively and move to a "2" or "1" rather than to a "10."
I have attached your full email at the end of this letter so no one can say I am quoting you out of context.
In response to your email, I sent you the following reply on 7 October 2012:
Surely, after 6 decades of failing to shut down fluoridation at home you must realize that a different strategy is necessary otherwise the efforts of the anti-fluoridation camp are nothing more than a mannerist and empty display, a pretense of civil action rather than an actual opposition.
The reason the gradual approach has failed to achieve anything other than raising awareness among a small percentage of engaged citizens is that it does not offer a rational explanation as to why such irrational decisions in regard to fluoridation should be the modus operandi of governments worldwide. WASP and other anti-fluoridation organizations address only the health effects of fluoridation and reduce it to an academic and medical debate. But fluoridation is not a public health policy; it is a demographic geopolitical policy. By reducing fluoridation to a public health measure you have allowed yourself to be shackled by the political class to the parameters they have set in order to prevent people from identifying the true purpose of fluoridation. As a result, you look at fluoridation as through a keyhole and see only what you are allowed to see rather than what you should be seeing. This narrowness and myopia have not gone unnoticed by the general public which is why you have remained utterly ineffective.
To use a medical metaphor, you identify and treat the symptoms of the disease but have yet to identify its cause. By failing to recognize and expose the cause of fluoridation you fail to be convincing and play into the hands of the political class by operating within their matrix of control. If you want to shut down fluoridation you must circumvent the matrix of control, outsmart it and deprive the political class of the justification it uses to impose genocide by chemical means on the world. First and foremost, you must deprive it of the cover of secrecy.
This is not a matter that can be resolved within the system because the entire international political order is built around population control as a substitute for war. The depopulation policy is the system, it is the reason for the system’s existence and it is the common denominator that has coalesced governments around the so-called New World Order.
You must stop thinking like a dentist and start thinking like a policy maker and a world leader if you want to even begin to comprehend the true purpose and importance of fluoridation.
You are reluctant to reveal the purpose of fluoridation to the public at large because you fear being ridiculed, thus because you are more concerned about your reputation and credibility than about saving lives by uttering the truth. In other words you are constrained in your actions by concerns about form when you should be concerned with substance. It is substance not form that matters. The reason I have asked all major anti-fluoridation figures and individuals to speak at once is to annihilate the likelihood of being met with incredulity. If all of you speak at once in support of my book then we cannot be attacked by the powers to be as proponents of conspiracy theories. The fact that they have chosen to censor my book at all costs and not even try to ridicule it or to attack my credibility is because they realize they cannot win any public debate and that by attempting to do so they will have given the public enough information to indict their governments for the very crimes I have identified.
The logic of my book and the evidence with which I support it speak for themselves. The intelligent will immediately have a eureka moment upon reading it. These individuals, who are the only individuals who matter – since the masses always follow the 10% – will at once recognize the veracity of my conclusions. They will think, ‘Yes, why didn’t I think of this; it is so simple, so obvious and so logical.’
We cannot build momentum and turn the tide of public awareness unless we all have the courage to speak the truth (however insane the truth appears to be at first glance) and nothing but the truth as one and at once when it matters. I had the courage to say it first (although I am sure I am not the first to have realized that depopulation by fluoridation is the other side of the coin of nuclear deterrence) and have opened the way for others to say it without fearing repercussions. The very audacity and insanity of the depopulation policy is what has protected it from being exposed for what it is.
The “enemy” we are fighting does not think solely in medical terms, they have evaluated the need for population control measures in light of an entire spectrum of factors and they have done this since the 1940s. I agree with them wholeheartedly that depopulation measures are an absolute necessity, but I do not agree with their methods, which do more damage than good. In a sense they know this and would like to change the methodology but have pinned themselves into a corner. If we speak together in support of depopulation we will free them from the prison they have built for themselves and by extension for us and will point the world in the right direction, which is collaborative and universal depopulation efforts by legislating a one-child policy. The powers to be will be thankful to us for having freed them from the clutches of hell. I cannot even imagine what it must be like to live with that burden on one’s conscience!
In my book I accuse them of genocide but I also exonerate them by explaining that they have acted to the best of their abilities within the possibilities of their time. As such, they have saved us from an even worse outcome. I make clear however that pursuing depopulation by covert measures of chemical and biological warfare is no longer justifiable in light of the existing alternative, which is legislating a one-child policy until the global population goes down to a number sustainable by food production methods that are not dependent on fertilizers made from fossil fuels.
If I ever make it to a position of power I will not touch a hair on the heads of these men. They had the courage and foresight to act when everyone else lived in ignorance, oblivious of the coming threat. We owe them a great debt of gratitude for what they have done between 1950 and 1980, but not for what they have done since. Nevertheless, they showed the courage needed to act while the rest of us did nothing. And political considerations being what they are, it is easy to see how they chose to stay the course rather than risk changing their methodology.
It is the courage to act that is needed to change course and you refuse to show that courage, Bill. It is not enough to be intelligent. To know is useless unless you have the courage to act on that knowledge.
You are very concerned about people’s sensibilities and perceptions. But what is more important their sensibilities or their lives? Surely, you will agree that saving their lives is far more important than protecting their sensibilities! They will curse us at first, as messengers of unwanted news, but they will thank us later, as saviors of their lives and of their genetic lines.
Your keyhole approach is ineffective because it gives the impression that fluoridation is a medical debate over a public health policy when in fact it is a demographic global policy that shapes and misshapes the entire international governance framework and perverts the rule of law and every value, freedom and right we hold. If you continue to deprive the public of this knowledge you will deprive them of the ability to frame fluoridation in its proper perspective and to rise to a higher level of consciousness that will compel them to think and act accordingly.
We are running out of time. In another 12 years there will be another billion people on earth. The environmental damage another billion people will cause to a world already beyond the tipping point is the equivalent of ten nuclear bombs exploding at the same time at different places on earth. You say I don’t know enough. Well, be that as it may, I know enough to know that depopulation is the task of our generation and that unless we do it right, we will not save civilization or the earth. Hell, we will not even be able to save our own children. I also know that we have been scheduled for annihilation and that is all I need to know to act.
This is do or die time, which is why there is now international consensus at the highest echelon of governance that genetically modified organisms must be employed in the developing world and elsewhere to sterilize the populace. While this makes demographic sense it is utter biological folly, as they will have shut down mankind’s ability to procreate and will therefore have undermined the very survival of the species, purportedly to save the species.
Stop thinking like a dentist and start thinking like a world leader, Bill. Otherwise you are wasting your time and your life’s work will amount to nothing more than overseeing the demise of your fellow men.
Forget about your reputation and about appearances and take the leap of faith necessary to win this battle and change the course of humankind. I am not asking you to set yourself on fire, though that is what Mohammed Bouazizi did, the Tunisian street vendor, and sparked a series of revolutions throughout the Middle East that are still unfolding.
All I am asking you is to add your voice to mine and help turn the tide. My record speaks for itself. I have single-handedly shut down the Prevent arm of Europe’s anti-terrorism and anti-radicalization strategy (Google “Galalae, Wikispooks” for the evidence of my achievement). I am as right about depopulation/fluoridation as I was about CONTEST, Britain’s and the EU’s surveillance and censorship measures used to infiltrate universities and control the academic discourse and manufacture consent.
Ask your friends in the anti-fluoridation world to issue a common statement to this effect. Once you do this other civil rights organizations will come aboard and then the truth will be unstoppable. As it is, civil society groups have specialized on particular issues and have no clue that they are all criticizing aspects of the same demon. Instead of attacking it together they keep nibbling at its heels and getting kicked in the head for their effete efforts.
The media is already chomping at the bits to tell the truth and I have received word that some journalists are taking steps to release news of my book. They will not succeed, however, unless we level the ground for them by annihilating the culture of silence behind which the depopulation policy hides.
I am doing this by forcing the religious establishment to act (http://community.ejc.net/profiles/blogs/letter-to-religious-leaders...), the UN Commissioner of Human Rights (http://community.ejc.net/profiles/blogs/letter-to-un-human-rights-c...) and, as you will see, other crucial players who will be more than eager to carve their names in history.
You state that mercury fillings and iatrogenic temporomandibular damage are as bad as or worse than fluoride, but you know that this is not the case. As I have estimated in my letter to the UN Human Rights Commissioner Navanethem Pillay:
“This covert policy of forced sterilization active in parts of the world since 1945 has prevented the birth of one billion children, has rendered infertile one out of every five women in the western world, has terminated some 300,000 million genetic lines, has undermined the reproductive systems of 850,000 million living males, has confused the sexual orientation of 15% of the population, has downgraded the genetic and intellectual endowment of entire nations, and has sickened countless millions by attacking the endocrine system which regulates mood, growth and development, tissue function, metabolism, sexual function and reproductive processes at the cellular level.”
Nothing comes even close to the enormity of the damage done by fluoridation. The only thing that will surpass it if we don’t act is GMOs.
The depopulation/fluoridation policy can only exist under the cover of the strictest regime of secrecy. I have already blown that cover and the policy is already dying like a vampire exposed to sunlight. It is up to all of us to drag it into the light and hold it there until it expires. This requires action and risk and some of us may not make it, but so be it. Real change is impossible without sacrifice. I am more than willing to sacrifice my life if that is what it takes to save the lives of my children and of my fellow men.
As I understand you are retired and have already lived a long and fruitful life. Whatever risk you take now no one can deprive you of a full life. I am 47 years old, have two young children (2 and 7 years old) and have many years of life ahead of me which I intend to live to the fullest. But I will not live like a rat or die like a rat.
What you should be afraid of is not your reputation or appearances but the legacy you leave behind and tangible evidence that your efforts have borne fruit. What you should be afraid of is living and dying like a rat rather than living and dying like a free man.
Please stop deliberating and start acting. I am counting on you.
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2012 09:22:03 -0700
In one of my health education courses, a professor used an example which has stuck with me, although I frequently fail to follow the advice. If we place a person's "position" on any subject on a scale of one to ten and that person's position (any position, smoking, cholesterol, fluoride, etc) is at a "3" and we want to persuade them to change their position to a "10," then we need to first move them to a "4" or "5" and then to a "6 or 7" and then try to move them to a "10." If we try to move them all the way to a "10" at the first contact, then there is a good chance most people will react negatively and move to a "2" or "1" rather than to a "10."
Let's use fluoridation as an example. Suppose I let my passion become so strong that I decide to go to the FDA headquarters and start to shout and scream that their lack of regulatory oversight is causing genocide. FDA ignores me. Then I get even more upset and have a heart attack and die. Now I'm not doing any good to anyone. Suppose I pour gas on myself and burn myself to death in the FDA's lobby? Again I'm dead and those promoting fluoridation will use my act as evidence for my mental instability and error. They will label me as "another one of those crazy anti fluoridation Dr. Strangelove's crazy's."
If I use the word "genocide" which I frequently think but don't say, then I will lose credibility. People will not accept that their government, the USA, the land that they love, is so barbaric. Instead of them listening to me, they will reject me. We have to come across factual and gentle. Sort of like courting a woman. If every woman that turns me on I instantly rip off her clothes and instantly penetrate her, there is a good chance she will not accept my request for a second date. Took me about 5 years and hundreds of hours of research before I became convinced that fluoridation is one of, or perhaps the greatest public health blunder.
Have I looked at the role of the World Court and filing charges of genocide? Absolutely. But it is my opinion, and I'm not a lawyer, that the World Court would not take my case until I had exhausted the legal system in the USA.
Have I put in a great deal of time and money into court cases? Yes. But the courts are very slow and they are expensive. In part, I'm back to work to earn money to use the "establishment" to fight fluoridation. Better to earn money and use the courts than burn myself to death in protest.
You asked how I could keep my professional position? Well, I wish fluoridation were the only problem in dentistry. Mercury fillings maybe just as bad. And the iatrogenic temporomandibular damage caused by dentists probably exceeds both the mercury and fluoride. I either maintain my professional presentation or I lose credibility on a number of dental fronts which are probably genocidal.
Frequently I hear politicians tell me that my worst enemies are those who agree with me on fluoridation and the way they come across is my biggest barrier.
So stay cool. You know a lot, but remember to be humble. 50% of what we know is wrong and we need to be open to our opinion having flaws. Should fluoridation stop. Yes. Lets give the proponents flowers and love to win their support rather than anger and bitterness to force them into submission.
Thanks for your help. We need everyone we can to stop fluoridation. Be gentle, stay cool, be professional.
Add a Comment